PRESS CTRL OR COMMAND+ FOR BIGGER TEXT, CTRL OR COMMAND- FOR SMALLER TEXT
SKIP TO NAVIGATION & SEARCH | SKIP TO CONTENT

{ blargh. }

genderbitch:

lucypaw:

ciscentrismsucks:

freshfeminism:

NO FOR FUCK’S SAKE. 

So many things wrong with this.

Bisexual means attraction to two genders. Bi means two. Two genders. Not necessarily women and men. A bisexual person can be attracted to genderqueer individuals and . There was some discussion on my blog about how most peoples’ definitions of bisexuality are rather binarist. There’s an example of it.

ANOTHER THING.

Someone who is attracted to all gender expressions.

Yes, that much is true. But wait, that’s not the issue that I have here.

men, women, and trans* 

C’mon… There are a LOT more types of gender expression other than “men, women, and trans*” …And I’m pretty sure that for most people (I’m not speaking on behalf of the trans* community), they don’t consider trans* to be a “third gender.” Trans* women are women. Trans* men are men. At least  add an “etc…” to tell people that there are more gender expressions than the three that you mentioned. 

OH, AND ANOTHER THING.

“Gender blindness”

By saying that you are “gender blind,” you’re basically saying “Haha I don’t give a flying fuck about your gender that you’re proud of and love so much coz I’m all gender blind and shit. I don’t have enough sensitivity to realize how much your gender identity matters to you. You’re ____? Great, I don’t care coz I’m gender blind.” 

NO. NO. NO.

This is like saying “I’m color blind.” 
You, asshat. Claiming that you’re apparently colorblind does nothing to help with racism. Rather, it’s erasing POC’s identities AND creating a problematic potential for privilege abuse and denial.

“I can’t be racist! I’m colorblind! …Wait, what’s that you say? I’m being ignorant and whitesplaining you about how your identity and pride of being a POC is irrelevant? Well, now YOU are being the racist one here. How can you possibly be PROUD of being a POC… We’re all human! Frankly, I think that it’s racist for you to be proud of your ethnic heritage. I’d get in trouble if I said that I was proud of being white. I am colorblind, so I don’t see race as an issue. I wish more people were colorblind like me…”

By saying that you are “gender blind,” you are completely erasing people’s gender identities.

Wait a sec, I’m not quite done yet.

bisexuals are attracted to biological men and women

Woah. Way to be cissexist and not understand what bisexuality is. The whole “bio man” “bio woman” thing is really othering. It’s telling trans* people that their identities are not valid because they must be biologically a man/woman to be a man/woman.

Basically, this response is awful.

“Gender blind”….

“Biological men and women” …

“Bisexual: Someone who is attracted to men and women” …

“all gender expressions- men, women, and trans*” 

Need I go on?

Now I’m done.

^ALL OF THIS.

Who the hell are these “project queer” people and why don’t they know some of the most basic things about being queer?

In case anyone wonders why I say I’m ‘queer’ and not ‘pansexual’ even though I am attracted to people of a wide variety of genders?  That nonsense that the Project Queer people have to say about what pansexuality means is actually the most common explanation from pansexual people as to what pansexuality is.  And, given that I’m trans and that my being trans is neither my gender nor my sex nor does it put me in a third category of either of those, I find that definition to be utter rubbish, especially when you throw in the whole ‘genderblind’ craptasticism.  Which is to say I agree with all the previous commentary.

Unfuck this third gendering misgendering erasing bullshit and this “genderblind” crap

Seriously, yes.  What the fuck was going through Sofia Loren Zombi’s head, goddamn.

(Source: feministilicious)

Women’s breasts, originally intended to nourish babies, are greatly fetishized by men. In a patriarchal culture, this makes them sacrosanct, so they must be covered up as something dirty. Dirty = arousing to men. (Men’s chests might be similarly arousing to women, but in a patriarchal culture, what is arousing to women is regarded as being of no real importance unless it suits male fantasy.)

Of course, as fetishized objects, boobs must also be made into ornaments (just like cars, also fetishized by men). So, they are primped and prodded, alternately bound and pumped up, displayed like prize ponies. Even if you don’t want to. (Have you tried to buy a non-wire bra recently that didn’t look like a Playtex Cross-your-heart? Good luck with that.)

When I first wrote the Subversive Scholastic essay, I got a lot of reactions from males who said, basically: You wanna take off your shirt? Hey alriiiight! Do it, babeeeeeee!

No, no and no.

If I should take off my shirt, I want you to be as lackadaisical about that as if your best male friend took off his shirt. Are you saying Hey alriiiight! to your best male friend and encouraging him to take off his shirt? Then I don’t want that either. Optimally, it would be nice if you didn’t even NOTICE.

Hey, says authoritative male voice, you can’t expect guys not to even notice, okay?

Question: Do women act like asses when men shed their tops? You know, we might be as excited about that as you are, has that ever occurred to you? But we have learned to behave ourselves. I am utterly confident that men could learn the same, if expected to.

Women should have a right to be shirtless  (via vegun)

“women”- read: people with breasts

(via rootandbone)

Decent analysis, but I don’t appreciate the “breasts=women” in this, nor do I appreciate the “originally intended to nourish babies.” I’m pretty indifferent toward my breasts most of the time. But they’re sure as hell never going to be used to nourish babies (breastfeeding is rad, I just don’t ever want to have babies) - I like my breasts because it feels awesome when my lovers touch them, not because I could squirt milk out of them if I ever got pregnant.

(via tsugaheterophylla)

reblogging for commentary.

(via kalemason)

Yeah, what they said.  And I’m not too fond of the assumption that all women are attracted to men, either.

(Source: iwillnotshavemyvagina, via tranzient-deactivated20110219-d)

{ these things should be common knowledge but sadly they are not, so *signal boost* }

tranzient (in response to my asking why Pink’s “Fuckin’ Perfect” video was problematic):

Um, well, it’s because “the face” of the stereotypical disturbed/suicidal/eating disordered teen is often white, middle class, thin which often erases people outside these areas such as males with eating disorder, people that are overweight with eating disorders,etc.

For example, in a study [here] they found that symptoms of eating disorders in white persons were detected at a higher rate than those of POC.

Not to mention,I don’t know why every disturbed teen has to be a part of some grunge-punky clique with lots of eye makeup…

EDIT: Commentary from tranzient:

saying that we are a nation of immigrants effectively erases the slave trade, massive colonization of the land, and the genocide of the native american people that were here before us.

EDIT: Commentary from tranzient:

saying that we are a nation of immigrants effectively erases the slave trade, massive colonization of the land, and the genocide of the native american people that were here before us.

(via bigbadcolored-deactivated201104)

tranzient:

saying that we are a nation of immigrants effectively erases the slave trade, massive colonization of the land, and the genocide of the native american people that were here before us.

Oshit hadn’t thought of that.  Very true.

tranzient:

saying that we are a nation of immigrants effectively erases the slave trade, massive colonization of the land, and the genocide of the native american people that were here before us.

Oshit hadn’t thought of that.  Very true.

(via tranzient-deactivated20110219-d)

{ LINK: even more awesome commentary on that "Canada is not so much a country as a holding tank" quote }

nezua:

“Canada is not so much a country as a holding tank filled with the disgruntled progeny of defeated peoples. French-Canadians consumed by self-pity; the descendants of Scots who fled the Duke of Cumberland; Irish, the famine; and Jews, the Black Hundreds. Then there are the peasants from Ukraine, Poland, Italy and Greece, convenient to grow wheat and dig out the ore and swing the hammers and run the restaurants, but otherwise to be kept in their place. Most of us are huddled tight to the border, looking into the candy store window, scared of the Americans on one side and of the bush on the other.”

Oh, Mordecai. (via michelledean)

At least no Asians or Indigenous people live in your version of Canada! Oddly not the Canada I experienced.

(via nezua)

This quote is not so much a prose passage as a holding tank filled with the disgruntled progeny of rough-hewn stereotypes, racist and colonialist erasure, and a projection of self-effacing yet unctuous malaise onto a many-faceted national story. As a Chinese person who grew up in a Jewish neighborhood of Montreal during the René Lévesque era, I’m familiar with these shapes of thought (yeah I read Richler, in fact one of my elementary school classmates played Jacob Two-Two in the film adaptation). This is what white Canadians call “multiculturalism”.

(via zuky)

{ LINK: Trans Woman of Color Erasure & Objectification }

dancingonembers:

September 30, 2008

(so, this might seem weird, but in addition to its actual content, this post is laying the groundwork for an analysis of the silence surrounding the recent anti-muslim terror attack in Ohio (see also. h/t to Cheshire Bitten. More of the groundwork will be done in a post to follow.)

How often do you see trans women of color speaking in their own voices? On the blogosphere (that is, user created media), there are quite a few: Holly, Tobi, Little Light, Mia Nikasimo, and Monica Roberts, who in turn highlights the voices of Marisa Richmond and Claudia Charriez, as well as (to a lesser degree of self determination) Isis Tsunami, Bulent Ersoy, Leang Sothea.

In non-blogosphere media (that is, media filtered through an organization), there are any number on the Being T documentary (whose names I don’t know)(h/t Monica), and the deceased Marsha P Johnson (who is rarely shown speaking for herself, almost always reduced to ‘activist and murder victim’) and Sylvia Rivera. Seriously.

In Chicago, one friend of mine is a labor organizer, and acquaintances of mine work at the Broadway Youth Center, and Howard Brown. In Minneapolis I met and briefly worked with women from The African American AIDS Task Force, The Indigenous People’s Task Force, District 202, and All Gender Health.

I make this long, long list not because it’s exhaustive (it’s not, please comment if I forgot you), but in order to make it painfully obvious that there are lots and lots of trans women of color speaking, saying and doing important shit.

And if you’re white and that’s what you think of when you hear “trans woman of color” (etc), I’ll eat my shoes. My hat, too. Hell, if you could name 5 accomplishments by trans women of color I’ll be impressed. But not because they aren’t accomplishing them. Because they’re not being reported.

Media visibility for trans women of color (scanty as it is) goes to 1)objectifying portrayals of sex workers, and 2)murder/hate crime victims. The white trans community seems to have replicated this pattern–while Becoming a Black Man1 and Still Black may have achieved some popularity, and Whipping Girl has spread like wildfire, almost all of what I see reported in transnews and on the blogosphere at large that covers TWOC is focused almost exclusively on their victimhood, and the commentary limited to that & dissection of the fetishization.

Of the top twenty hits googling “trans woman of color”, only two were definitively not about that person being a victim (or survivor) of racist trans misogynistic physical violence, one of which was a comment by Little Light in response to transphobic hate speech included in the 59th Carnival of Feminists; 7 of the first 10 results for “trans women of color” are about transphobic violence (though one does have a positive unrelated story), and the other three are about Isis and Lavergne on reality TV. By contrast, not one of the first 10 for “trans women” focuses on physical violence, and only three out of ten for “trans woman”. Neither “trans man of color” nor “trans men of color” turned up any results obviously violence related (though the “Becoming a Black Man does relate to violence, it’s not in such an objectifying way.).

Say it with me now: trans women of color are not objects. They are not (only) victims. They are not the people you can push the pity party onto when you’re tired of dealing with it yourself and want to be seen acting to change shit. Yes, they are at vastly greater risk of violence than the rest of us trans folks–and just because you bring that up when transphobic/trans misogynistic violence is being talked about does not make you a “good ally“. Their deaths do not define their existence. Yes, many are sex workers because of economic marginalization–and this does not define their lives. They are more than points in a power struggle between multiple groups of white trans activists and cis feminists.

As Leah Lakshmi Piepzna-Samarasinha writes in “The Femme Shark Manifesto”:

FEMMES ARE LEADERS IN TAKING CARE OF BUSINESS/ DEFENDING OUR QUEER AND TRANS OF COLOR COMMUNITIES.

WE USED OUR STILETTOS AS WEAPONS AT STONEWALL

WE WERE THE TRANS[ ]WOMEN WHO FOUGHT BACK AT THE COMPTON CAFETERIA

WE’RE THE GIRLS WHO STARE DOWN ASSHOLES STARING AT OUR LOVERS AND FRIENDS ON THE SUBWAY….

WE REMEMBER OUR DEAD- SAKIA GUNN, GWEN ARAUJO, AND MANY OTHER QUEER AND TRANS POC WHO DIED BECAUSE OF RACIST, HOMO/TRANSPHOBIC VIOLENCE. NOT AS A POLITICAL STATEMENT BUT AS WOMEN WE LOVED IN REAL LIFE WOMEN WHO COULD’VE BEEN US OR OUR LOVES.(link) (note–this piece is about queer femmes of color, not specifically trans ones. And you should read it.)

More later.

1: A rather (trans) misogynistic article at that–it does include trans women’s voices, but only as a means to further oppress them/erase their voices and further the subtextual point ‘black men have it worse than black women’. See also my performance piece, So Shut Up.

* * *

bolding is mine, because that is what I did in my hysterical post last night. - C

(via tranzient-deactivated20110219-d)

genderbitch:

calixti:

genderbitch:

Or three, or four, or five, or six, or +

Whenever I see stuff like this that casually erases poly folk, I always mentally rewrite it. In a lot of cases, including this one, it’s really easy to fix by leaving out the number which makes me wish they just WOULD. People make me :/.

People make me :/ too.

[image: text: “Fact No. 23: Good relationships don’t just happen, they take time, patience and two people who want to be together.”]
reblogging for commentary

genderbitch:

calixti:

genderbitch:

Or three, or four, or five, or six, or +

Whenever I see stuff like this that casually erases poly folk, I always mentally rewrite it. In a lot of cases, including this one, it’s really easy to fix by leaving out the number which makes me wish they just WOULD. People make me :/.

People make me :/ too.

[image: text: “Fact No. 23: Good relationships don’t just happen, they take time, patience and two people who want to be together.”]

reblogging for commentary

{ DON’T INCLUDE THE T UNLESS YOU ARE ACTUALLY INCLUDING THE T. }

genderbitch:

contrajackson:

“T” is not an orientation. “T” has nothing at all to do with the “L,” the “G” or the “B.”

Being an ally of and an advocate for LGB rights is not the same thing as being a trans* ally. Not even close. Barely in the same universe.

This never fails to piss me off.

GLB thinks the T stands for Tomato.

(Source: luciferious, via that-cabbage)

“More than 1,500 people in this predominantly Latino community took part in the protest, many of them chanting “Si, se puede,” the Spanish-language version of President Obama’s 2008 campaign slogan.”

amazed  how quick erasure takes place.

California Latinos protest Arizona push to end birthright citizenship - By the CNN Wire staff

You have got to be kidding me.

From the first two paragraphs of the wikipedia page for Sí se puede.:

Sí, se puede (Spanish for “Yes, it is possible” or, roughly, “Yes, it can be done”[1]) is the motto of the United Farm Workers. In 1972, during Cesar Chavez’s 24 day fast in Phoenix, Arizona, he and UFW’s co-founder, Dolores Huerta came up with the slogan.[1]

The phrase has been widely adopted by other labor unions and civil rights organizations and drew widespread political and media attention as a rallying cry during the 2006 U.S. immigration reform protests.[2][3]

This is what cultural appropriation looks like, if you’re ever in need of an example.

(via sexartandpolitics)

^^^

(via healingsakina

)

And I just am convinced these jackasses don’t read anything not written by white folks

(via blackamazon)

I knew the phrase before the Obama campaign, but I never knew about it being from any political movement. Let alone anything as important as United Farm Worker and labor unions.

And it’s kind of hilariously terrible to me now, remembering how I did learn the phrase: from Disney!  Yup. Good ol’ Disney used it in a tv movie called, “Gotta Kick It Up.” I remember cuz I was confused on how ‘si se puede’ meant ‘yes WE can.’ (I hadn’t taken formal spanish classes yet).

But yeah, perfect example of appropriation and imperialism and commercialization and everything else terrible.  Thanks for schoolin me on what these words actually stand for.

(via liquornspice)

I love how whenever I told my friends/people I interacted with on a daily basis at school this they didn’t believe me because ya know it is obvious that I just pulled out all that factual information that I provided them out of my ass. P.s. On a related side note most people don’t even know of the involvement of Filipin@ ( (if this is incorrect terminology please let me know) Statesian activists in the Farm Workers movement. (via genderqueerdukeofmexico)

cnn = the reek of ass

(via femmequeermexicanaslut)